July 05

Let start this week off with a bang - cause god knows regardless of the fact that fireworks are illegal (at least the fun kind) in Colorado, I can thank the fact that the police in downtown Denver have better things to do than chase 14 year old kids while ignoring the people breaking into rich sod's cars during the All-Star Game nonsense this week. At least that would explain all the explosions that were in a mere 2 block distance from the federal courthouse where they tried the person responsible for the biggest domestic M-80 this decade. But local news aside, something interresting struck me this week that I may have overlooked in previous weeks, but have been noticing on Quark's BBS as well as my own. This observation is of the veign of "PC users are more creative since they have to troubleshoot more often blah blah blah". Well, try this one for size. Mac users are lowlife. Now before you go on and groan this away - let's take a look at what Macs are used for and what PC users are doing. The largest segment of Mac users today professionally are graphic designers (which haven't migrated yet), and people in the production side of art. Well if you don't already know - people who do art for a living suck the left nut of the common paycheck. It's no surprise. Hell the only people in Graphic Design and Advertising that make any load of money - ever - are the people who own the agency that carries a decent profit margin. They don't generally count however, because after 8 years of looking at things from the inside I've concluded that these people never give their computers a second look - after all, that's why they have production people and secretaries. The rest is all done by pencil or the usual pass-fail of what is placed in front of them. But the people who actually produce anything with a Mac signature are making dick in the long scheme of things. That's why I ditched traditional design businesses for a real salary and one that isn't tainted by the Mac set. The internet. Sure there's still some boob around that use the Mac to create some spotty graphics for the net - but they also make dick. The people who really make money on the internet are those that program and do database work. And to date - in any office I've seen - none of these high-paid rascals are doing it on a Mac. With the rare exception of those who are cursed to cross-develop programs and applications on the Macintosh, no programmer worth his salt - or his paycheck spends his time on Apple hardware. No serious consultant or salesperson who spends times with computers uses a Mac by and large. No stock trader uses a Mac. No real-estate people use Mac's. In fact since 95% of the general public doesn't use a Mac, that's basically either the struggling artist set, or the people who don't collect paychecks who DO use them. And this is according to Apple's own statistics as well as the IDC. So, if the majority of people out there who are cleaning up developing and using Wintels by the droves represent the majority of the people pulling down healthy professional paychecks - who are these uncouth people using Mac's that seem to easily cast-off convention and loose all sense of purpose and politeness to whine, bitch and moan about the Mac while the rest of the public doesn't give a damn? Basically, underpaid struggling lowlifes. I don't really see any difference between an obnoxious low-rent income Mac user and the obnoxious low paid scum who don't use computers. You can try to use niche examples to prove me wrong, but take a look around you and your salaries. See anyone making a decent paycheck doing dick on a Mac? I certainly see plenty of people making what most people make the first year out of college using Macs every day and read their stories on the various chat-groups out there every week. What do I see? People who were passed over for life's general income level, and people who grouse at the drop of the hat. Perhaps that's why most of us can't figure out what the MacJihad are all about - because after all - we don't spend time with lowlifes enough to even begin to relate to their rants and bizzare afflicitons of interrest. Particularly when they seem over and above concerned about Apple Computers, and not what everyone else uses, and then turns off at the end of a "normal" working day and go home to a succesful status mark of what they've achieved. I'd certainly like to know how many low-rent apartments seem to house Mac's as opposed to the many homes - real homes - that have Wintels. I think we already know the answer to that one.


July 06

Well reports of the MacMarines death are more than a little unfounded, in fact they're living better than ever. Which is a good thing, since those bozos have been sabotaging sites more than ever. This site was taken down either by the marines or by someone trying to pretend to be one. The ironic justice in this case against the MacJihad is the fact that they claimed the site made Mac users look bad - thus they had to shut it down. Now really, what makes the MacJihad look worse - a few tender observations showing them for the wackos they are - or them actually acting like wackos? You tell me! Well it strikes me that calling them wackos - instead of fuckwits or something really deserving of thier conduct - is really just my way of being polite since after all, they've shot themselves in the foot now 3 times in one month that they would be getting dishonerable discharges for those whistling though their shoes left and right. But what do you expect when a userbase devolves from respectibility into abject desperation. It probably stems from the same sillyness that makes them wonder if the Wintel crowd - IE: 90% of the computing public - actually gives a rats ass about what Apple is doing as if we cared. Well, we care more about moronic behavior and in your face sillyness than anything Apple would do - but of course it's all good PR for the people in Cupertino so what the hell do I care.


July 07

The MacWorld expo is on us again, and if you didn't hear it from me - you're excused for ignorance since absolutly no one gives a shit about it in the popular press. The geek press sure - but mostly the Mac booster club is actually giving it the time of day. The reason? Not a global conspiracy of black aircraft dive bombers in public media JFK killers as the Jihad would have you think - but merely pure who-cares boredom. Get-real, do you think that a platform that sconces little more than 4% of the computing public - with a readership that can't keep MacUser or MacWeek magazine afloat would actually garner so much as a peep from those who cover the computer circut (to coin a phrase). It's just continuing proof that no one really gives a crap about non-standard, obsolete, niche computer platforms anymore. But I've been on the front lines of this scenario 5 years ago. When NeXTworld magazine held their "expo" in 1993, no one gave a shit even when Steve Jobs DID give an address. The whole kit and kaboodle of tech was beyond the reach of the general public in overall pointlessness, and the marketing and product focus was beyond blurry - it was pure muck. Well why it went over like a niche fringe cult exercise in the popular media is less than obvious - but it's taken the current trend of Apple to give Comdex, Cebit and every other credible computer show a miss for mass-marketing tripe under a PR banner for the truth to sink in for the MacJihad. Which is a pitty because all and all, I seriously doubt they still have any idea as to what the hell is going on - and still point fingers at some conspiracy exercise that must be calculated against them. If only it was as interresting as that.


July 08

Well what do you know, Steve Jobs DID manage to show up at the MacWorld expo. Just in time too because almost half the show elapsed and then the press did actually listen to what he said. Of course none of this was page one, and it didn't trickle past the computer pubs - but pay the ignoring public no mind, there's important things afoot. Well it looks like the Pixar Disney thing and Steve got Disney to do an about face and port one of their online products. Yippie-Skippie. I particularly liked MSNBC's quote from Disney as to why they didn't do it earlier. Paraphrasing: "oh boo hoo, the plug ins we used weren't available on the mac, nor were the tools". Well la-te-da! I thought Mac's were behind 60% of the websites out there with tools abound? Guess not - next bone to contend with - Apple's looking at another profitable quarter. I hope so, with all the cutbacks they should show something for their troubles since sales have continued to slide and the inventory is still parked on the shelves more now than ever before. Lord knows I'm sure a few Irish would like to know that their walking papers helped out somehow. The biggest Jobsian hype that really bugs me is the following: 177 developers have signed on for the iMac in the last 63 days. Uh - HUH! Sure they did Steve - sure they did. I'm sorry I guess 1991 is too distant for the MacJihad to remember - but this ex-NeXT user recalls very vividly how Quark was "commited" to the NeXT - and would "release" their software for the platform. All of this was said by the same man, with the same limelight of misguided hope behind him about how all the new software from Lotus, Wordperfect, Adobe, and of course Quark - were to push NeXT sales into the real-world. Naturally there were numbers cited as to advance orders which were utter bullshit, but don't worry - the developers were going NeXT! Well, Wordperfect was tanking as he spoke their name, Quark decided NeXT was full of shit, Adobe released 1 whole product and then failed to support it, and Lotus didn't make very much money from a product that was given away with the computer, and then promptly noticed the flagging sales and ported "Improv" straight to Windows to get the damn thing to pay at least for it's R&D budget. So less than a year after each and every publisher rallied behind Jobs - they all basically said to hell with this and moved on. I noticed a year ago ID was the bigman on campus with Steve saying that games are back with Mac. These days, ID has pretty much run away screaming from it's horrific experience in loosing money siding with Apple and now - a year later - Jobs is STILL saying they've got games on the brain. I wonder who the victim will be this time - because after all - Apple's own people have already gone on record for saying that due to the lack of any 3D shit, there's nothing really game ready for them to offer hardwarewise. Never you mind. Steve has spoken again. But for me the highest of the low points had to be the crash prone data demo that was showcased with a "businessman" using a Wintel - and a kid and a dog "literally" using a Mac. Titter tee hee all you want. I find it ironic that us pundits have responded in the past to Steve Jobs and his kool-aide presentations in the past as "dog and poney shows" but now he's actaully put the dog on stage - ho ho hooo! And it wasn't the Mac!


July 09

AG Edwards - one of the largest people in the Wall Street community for you low-lifes not in the know about the stock market and things - has gone on record with a recent soundbite from Jimmy Johnson rep as quote "That apple isn't growing sales, but is merely trying to get it's installed base back to the fold". Well fucking - duh. The fact that their ads aren't of any interrest to anyone but the giggling MacJihad low-lifes who rant on and one, time and time again about their precious "Das-komputers", while the rest of us just use the damn things - not live our lives around them, you have to realize that nothing Apple is doing is for anyone but those who have already spent too much money on Apple product. It's half the reason that most of us don't care - and in spite of what the Jihad would have you think - we don't shudder in fear of the iMac, horrible misguided statistics on processor speed, or how we're all toasted.....or something..... The fact is we don't give shit-one about Apple by in large, the press doesn't give shit-one about Apple by in large, and anyone whose had any contact with the MacJihad either are really perplexed by their infatuatuations, and their shoddy rants against an "evil empire". Those who have had the misfortune to run up against such low-life wierdness and obnoxious pompacity, in the most abstract user of the term, just usually shake our heads and walk away. That's why it comes as no surprise that the financial community (ie:those who make more money than the Apple-set) would be noticing that all of the bullshit that Apple is slinging these days is purely at it's own fanbase to keep them in the fold. That's why I've often refered to it before as "preaching to the choir". Amen.


July 10

More indications that the current Apple directions is only geared twords a fanbase much smaller than the population of Utah, and it's new world christ order ilk (makes you wonder about Sen. Leiberman doesn't it?). Cnet reports that International Data Corp's., otherwise known as Apple's former cheerleading statistical section, Eric Lewis - had this to say about the iMac. Quote - "the iMac may not be enough to attract a large amount of users, but merely caters to the existing users". Fucking-duh pt 2. I seriously dare anyone, anywhere to walk out on the street - and ask anyone they see about what they think about the iMac. Go ahead - do it. Take a smoke break or something and do it. Did you get a bizzare stare as if you were a freak or something? Get the picture yet? The biggest thing I've seen in the paper is a 200mghz Pentium with MMX fetching 1 single grand with a 12 inch color screen in laptop form. News like this makes me wonder how long I can put up with my current ThinkPad, but I'm holding out till the year 2001 or 2000 at least before I take the upgrade plunge - and it won't be for more than 1300.00. Yet for some reason the Jihad think's that everyone is going to swap OS's for this tacky unexpandible floppyless box that goes for 1300 as well. Curious that one, because according to MSNBC reports the two most asked questions about the iMac at the convention were - why no floppy (saw that one coming folks) - and two, why green. The later of the two the person talking coudn't answer - but between you me - it's Steve's fave color. Yep. It harkens back to live coverage of one of the 1991 expo where all the slides were green, and Steve was remarked as saying - as the story goes - "I love that green" where then his toadies chimed in "nice green yes very nice green". So it's no shocker that the aqua marine case would shift to a turtle green case now would it. Steve wouln't possibly be micro-manging his baby into the ground no would he? Naaaaaah!


July 11

Since the "MacWorld - we're the last magazine Apple has these days and all" expo grinds on, it's already been remarked that this might have well been called the iMac expo - at least according to Cnet. Well, I'd have to agree because I'm concluding this week with yet-another iMac rant. MacOSrumors confirms what I've been going on about for so damn long. This little piece of product is actually the NCmac that we've heard about for so long that seemed - oddly enough - to vanish off the damn radar. Well why would that occur you might ask? Well because NC's are tanking in the marketplace as 800 dollar dumbshit doorstops on the heels of under 900, 800, and even 700 dollar Wintels. So what to do? Do you realease a product designed to placate a board member from Oracle that is still living out the NC reality that no one outside of Oracle or Apple can fathom - or do you "suddenly" call it the "iMac" and save face? Can you say - quick change the labels on this dog? I knew you could! Well guess what! I have this odd suspicion that those very same people that can't quite buy into a speedy non-computer one of those (without liberal attachments of pricey add-ons) might just also shake their heads at something that had a mission statement from mars. I mean get this - the general public doesn't give crap about a fully loaded NC, but they might go for something called the iMac when it's totally clear that the general public seems to like full feature-sets at the time of buy? Whoduthinkit? Not Apple! It certainly casts a new light on this "consumer" Mac when it's inception had nothing to do with "consumer" products in the slightest. Wonder if that means the people who do buy them are idiots or just suckers for a name change eh? I'm dying here! And there was much LOL.


back
_home_|_why_|_win_|_backdraft_|_links_|_biblio_
_letters_|_download_|_current_|_bbbs_|_goodshit_