May 31

MacWeek had a little bug announcing reports from E3 several days this last week reporting that the Mac is really heating up the E3. I didn't need to read any further because anything beyond this single soundbite of crap is beyond the relm of plausability, possibility, or the worse unverified dellusional hack crap that any pinhead journalist would type onto screen. I mean let's take a good hard look at the gaming industry. First, everyone can take their unbiased eye - and just see - SEE - what the imbalance is on the store shelves are across america for games between Mac and Wintel computers. I mean forget the 10-1 lopsided coverage of the general publishing industry. Forget the fact that the development community between the two platforms has gone from 70% parity to 10%. Just keep in mind that while the OVERALL software picture for the Mac is pathetic in the relm of software support, the support for games makes up only a portion of the overall scene. And a small scene it is. Second - with ID reporting Mac users staying away from their products in droves, while chalking up record numbers of PC sales, one can surmise that for this hit-producer, the miserable 50 thousand sold sales figures would otherwise be a high-water mark for game makers on the Mac. I would say the greatest proof about all of the above though is this. Can you - or ANYONE - name me a single MacGame publisher that is still in business or hasn't tossed in the towel for higher ground? Silicon Beach? Gone. Cassedy and Greene? Gone. ID? Left the building. EA? Left the platform high and dry. With the only exception of Bungee - which sells mostly to Wintel users these days - I can't think of a single game publsher apart from the Myst folks that gives a rats ass about the Mac anymore. I mean cheese and rice - even Douglas Adams won't publish games for Apple's fruitcart! And speaking of carts - here's number three. Console games you frigging MacWeek idiots! Lessie TRST numbers indicate that Sony has - ooooh - 11 million Playstation's sold, at 129.00 - and Nintendo has around 7 million Nintendo 64's sold. Sega regrettibly has fumbled the ball by blowing the consumer price curve at the kickoff line. What do these companies have that Apple doesn't? Their entire existanal neck on the line with the gameplaying public! That's what! PC game makers usually have to fight for shelf space, and take a gamble with oversized packaging that their product will sell. Well, EVERY NINTENDO GAME has sold 1 million units. That means every product that Nintendo has marketed - has gone Gold in record industry measurements. Sony, no slouch can't assure those numbers-per-game anymore since they have HUNDREDS of titles selling for their system vs Nintendo's trickle out policy to increase long-term positioning vs possible gaming glut scenearios ala Atari Inc., and their 2600 circa 1983. Mind you, this convcern is a bit of a cop-out in this day and age when Video Games have surpassed 8 BILLION DOLLARS a year in revenue with a 1 BILLION dollar increase in revenue forcast for the new year. This is larger than the revenues of TV, Records/CD sales, and Hollywood combined and dwarfs both the sell-through and the per-home numbers of Video Game's golden age when Pac-Man was the rage. And Apple - with their pittance of a pittance in marketshare - a marketshare divided to selling entertainment on 1200 and up dollar boxes rather than 120 and up dollar boxes - Apple - SOMEHOW - is setting the E3 on fire? In your dreams MacWeek and Apple. In your dreams. If anything is on fire, or is otherwise baked, it smells a lot like crap roasting next to a fruity brand of hype. Good God.


June 01

Well it's official. Multi-slot Macintoshes have died the big kackeroo. That would be 6 slotters which are the mainstay and staple of the music and video crowd. But with most producers, post-producers, and directors getting the hell out of the fruit-based TV and Hollywood business - who can blame Apple and the demise of the clone vendors for choosing to do otherwise? Of course what ZDnet neglected to mention was that - in spite of jury rigged breakout box solutions - no producer in his right mind is going to sacrafice bus-bandwith with their professional ass on the line. I mean lessie. Could use about a hundred or so off the shelf Wintel software solutions, all rigged into an off the shelf multi-processor Wintel box, come out cheaper on the hardware and software cost estimate, be more in lockstep with the majority of their peers in workflow - SGI and Sun solutions aside - and NO no no no no - we'll sod all that and get a new pretty Power Mac! And it has a break-out box TOO! In an industry that now applies the computer to creating more flights of fancy - this one takes the cake. This wouldn't be a dream system for your average video and film pixel pusher. This would be an outright nightmare. That would be a little more in keeping with why Apple and what remaining - dying - clone vendors would be doing with them. IE: dropping them like a penny off the Empire State Building. In this case, if the reamining pro-box setups out there are taking over Hollywood like King Kong, Apple isn't more than the splotch left under the footprint from the innocent bystander scene. You'll note I left Godzilla out of this - because not only is the movie tanking - I almost wonder if Steve Jobs was pitching that stinkburger. Trust me. If you want to see a good movie with a more across the board - popular public demographic target (in stark contrast from my fave - Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas) - go see The Truman Show instead. You'll never look at the JennyCam site the same again. Smartest scenario film since Brazil in my book - or my site for that matter.


June 02

Byte magazine bites the big one. It's ceasing publication on the heels of MacWeek magazine. Now apart from splitting hair about how much of their coverage was pro-fruit and anti-intel - and how this might just annoy the majority of users who want to know which PC is best for them, rather than being haranged for considering anything but Apple's products - one has to look at the larger picture about their tenure, and how it bodes for Apple. Well, neither is pretty I'll tell-ya. First, I have covers extoling the ever-unusable single floppy Mac128 as revolutionary. Yep. It's revolution was that you'd get arthritis in record time from all the disk swapping you'd be doing - with the application base that you could count on one hand. More of a coup-de-tait really. Then there was the extolls for the Apple IIGS. Nice as the GS was, it was lackluster in comparrison to the Atari ST and the Amiga of the time in horsepower, specmarks, and general useability - if you don't count the Apple II software base which you could dump 200 bucks and get an Apple II to run that stuff on anyway. Then the big one - they loved NeXT. Oh yah. They looooooved NeXT. It was the best thing since sliced bread. But aside from being a dog to Steve Jobs and his pile of stink that was otherwise fun to roll around in - PR style - there were several things missing that would have been nice to clue the consumer reading their rag on. Like the lack of the floppy drive, lack of software, lack of speed, lack of a sane price-tag, lack of a market-focus, lack of color. On and on and on. Well, this kind of unbiased reporting must have caught up with them, because in spite of their mind-blowing and reality-bending benchmarks - no one gave a shit anymore. Except Apple of course. Because here's something the other sites and magazines may have neglected to remenice on when hammering out their eulogies for this publication. Apple has spent nearly 300 million dollars creating an advertising campeign exclusively built on the benchmarks of a now dead publication! I mean THAT'S RICH! Lessie - Byte magazine - ok, they're dead but so what! - sez we're great in the speed department. Buy our crap! That message has great take-home value I'll tell ya. Nothing says "were full of shit" like making the focus of your full-court advantage like representing the figures from a dead magazine. Oh ya. Total credibility builder there. Wonder how they'll switch gears in mid-stream on their advertising focus now I wonder? Guess they'll have to go with MacAddict or some such rag.


June 03

Well speaking of games, here another publisher that I forgot to mention that the good folks in BBBS had pointed out to me. It seems that back in April 29 1998, Interplay executive - Bill Dugan - had endured enough. It seems that they - like most other software publishers (particularly game publishers) had considered dropping the Mac, like an Apple from the leaning tower of Piza. Well - they did. What they also did in a memo that I need to link in the Links section is that they wanted the MacJihad to fuck off. And badly. It would seem that these little rug-rats were crying all the way to mommy and spamming the living jeezus out of the company for their otherwise solid financial reason to pull out of the Applecart business. Well, the MacJihad didn't believe they would be slighted - and took vengance filling their e-mail boxes to the brink from a campeign that had all the earmarks of the EvangeListas. Well - it worked. Now interplay hates your fucking guts MacJihadders. Way to go. Good job. Give yourself a pat on the back. Because in the middle and end of the long winded, self-defensive (please don't flood our asses again) tome, is the words: if you really care about games - it wouldn't hurt to actually buy some of them from time to time. The rest of the tirade talks about such glowing terms as "it would make more financial sense to have our Mac programmers make a new special effect or give our PC games an edge for sales than waste our resources on Mac products". Ouch - that gotta hurt. But what mystifies me is - I thought the Mac was "burning up the E3"? Guess what? Guess not!


June 04

When Apple is pissed, it wages WAR. And this time the front lines are those terrible, awful, horrible citizens in the USA who are exercising their Suprime Court protected rights to sell whatever the hell isn't illegal to the general public. Well, it offical. If you're selling Apple's without Steve Jobs' blessing, then you're guilty of several mortal sins - and will burn in legal hell because of it. At least until your lawyer notices that you're in the right by high-court legal precidenence. But when did outright legal, Amercian values amount to a hill of beans with the Macintosh Ubber Alliesl. Call me Himmler, but I've seen more outlandish propoganda that the ilk reporting on Apple's new "Searchlight Program". I mean forget George Orwell and his editorial aside in Apple's now famous "it's hammer time" campeign. These fuckers are going Big Brother in a big way. And if you're selling Macintoshes lower than Apple's website - they're going to go 1984 all over your ass. Isn't free enterprise wonderful? Not in Amerkia, and not for Apple resellers buddy. But in the long haul - you don't have to worry about any big-ass hatezone trial coverage to work your party affiliations up over. Most of the resellers have already commented that the Mac sales they had were dismal at best. Good riddance to Apple, and screw their lawyers. Good to know that Apple is posturing their dollars in both a positive way, and also making more friends to their cause. Cough.


June 05

MacWeek - rhymes with AckLeak - issues a report that Rhapsody is offically dead. Alright - where were you guys a month ago? Fruit got your tongue? They of course make it offical out of Mac OS Rumors something we already knew. In a stunning reversal of the obvious, they are going to unbundle what Apple paid 400 million dollars plus for (with a free Steve Jobs inside), and break it into incremental - and fragmented - upgrades into MacOS X because, "the developers would have liked it that way". That is, whomever developers are still giving a shit. But don't worry. This is NOTHING like the time they said that Copland was going to be shelved and re-oriented into a series of incrimental upgrades. Nope no coincidnece of bullshit here! Pay it no mind. At least - please god please - until the end of 1999. When no one will remember when the hell Apple stuck their dick up the MacJihad's ass in much the same fashion. Hope they have Vaseline for this round of pussy-boy grinding because I can't possibly see how their going to affect a smile otherwise. On the other hand, you have to wonder. Perhaps the real reason Apple has so many followers would go behind the alternative lifestyle set - or at least those into S & M. It would make things much clearer on this side of the laptop to be sure. BOGUM has never had a clearer ring of truth to it to be sure in the long foreplay of the decade.


June 06

Motorola has had to lay off a ton of people in the chip department recently - amounting to a 10% cut in the hired geeks that have given their life and mortgage to the cause because of the sagging demand for their chips. Now MOST of the pop-press has pigeon-toed the line and mimed the usual - it's the people in Asia's fault. Damn their less than robust economy. Well, there could be the fault of Korea, China, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia - or Apple. Guess which one I'm betting on? You know, when your sales for your crap go down by more than 50% from the previous year - there's a good chance that you're primary chip fabricator - just might - have a little trouble moving the merchandise. Perhaps now we know why the hell IBM bailed out of the PPC nonsense when they did, why ever bizzare Motorola (the same people who actually licensed both the Magic Cap OS and the Newton into their product line - those crazy nutballs) kept plugging away while the disaster klaxons called out in ever-higher declibel levels. Well, reality can be a bitch. I noticed that Intel is doing pretty good these days....as is Cyrix, AMD, and several others. Wonder who their selling their chips to that Apple isn't. Almost makes YOU wonder eh?


back
_home_|_why_|_win_|_backdraft_|_links_|_biblio_
_letters_|_download_|_current_|_bbbs_|_goodshit_